WebLewis v United States, 680 F.2d 1239 (9th Cir. 1982). In other words, the Fed enjoys no United States immunity from law suit because it is a Federal institution in name only. ... - “Caha v. US, 152 U.S. 211 (1894)” (U.S. regulations apply only within the U.S. territories and the District of Columbia. WebThis holding is found in the adjudged decision of Caha v. United States, 152 U.S. 211, 221, 222 (1894), to wit: But we are of opinion that there was no necessity for a formal introduction in evidence of such rules and regulations. They are matters of which courts of the United States take judicial notice. . . .
CAHA v. U.S., 152 U.S. 211 (1894) FindLaw
http://abodia.com/t/irs/pdfs/Income%20Tax%20-%20Ray.pdf http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/htm/chapter4.htm cheap reborns.com
Caha v. United States, 152 U.S. 211 (1894) PDF - Scribd
Web— Caha v. U.S., 152 U.S. 211 (1894) The District of Columbia is the ONLY Jurisdiction for the application and imposition of the special statutory laws in Title 26. In this Jurisdiction, one must realize that it is ‘Geographically’ comprised of the 10-mile square-area but also the ‘Legislative’ Jurisdiction of the National Government. WebUnited States, 144 U.S. 263, 297, and Caha v. United States , 152 U.S. 211, 214 , by implication, at least, support this conclusion. In Caha's case , the act of Congress expressly reserved the former jurisdiction, not only over prosecutions already commenced, but also over crimes already committed. WebOn March 31, 1893, plaintiff in error, having been found guilty of the crime of perjury by the verdict of a jury, was sentenced to confinement in the Kansas state penitentiary for a … cheap reborns